Friday, June 4, 2010
Indians, Missionaries, Pioneers, Developers
When the Europeans came to the Midwestern United States, the views of the missionaries must have been discomforting to the shamens of the Iroquis Nation. But they were hunting souls, not land, so it was a curious but not society-shaking intrusion on their way of life. When the pioneers came, cut and cleared the forests and plowed the land, that was a revelation of a more serious order. Who would have known that, barely two hundred later, many of the farmer-descendants of those original settlers would be forced off their land by incorporation and development? On a basic level, there's probably not much difference between an American Indian who has lost his way of life and an American farmer who has lost his.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yup. Still wrong.
ReplyDeleteIt's funny, I grew up out west and hadn't realized the peaceful cohobitation of the missionaries and early traders (mostly French) until moving to Michigan--Indians bring their furs to trade for goods, everyone is happy (even if many are converted) but the British attitudes really messed things up, didn't they.
The Spanish in Mexico likewise moved in and married, instead of stealing. (erm... other than the gold part), but the British indoctrinization of American was pretty darned bad for our humanity... and now Capitalism is doing the same.
(or so I see it) Funny that I am such an Anglophile now, but my opinions of history don't leave the British smelling very good.
It's all about change, I suppose, and, depending on who you are, your point of view. I commented as I did because I've been writing some pioneer stories. One way to look at the current swarm of hispanics into the US is that it's simply a migration. Your point about the English inability to assimilate into the indigenous population is a good one. On the other hand, prejudice is where you find it, and there was/is enough to go around in all the tribes of Europe...indeed, in all the cultures of the world.
ReplyDelete